<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Webdogs 2.0 &#187; analytics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webdogs.org/tag/analytics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webdogs.org</link>
	<description>Webdogs 2.0 ~ data, design and derring-do since, uh, whenever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:04:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Revisiting web stats for the California Food Stamp Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.webdogs.org/2010/02/11/revisiting-web-stats-for-the-california-food-stamp-guide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webdogs.org/2010/02/11/revisiting-web-stats-for-the-california-food-stamp-guide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lawlor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food stamps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nyt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdogs.org/?p=1239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Part of its ongoing &#8220;Safety Net&#8221; series, this morning&#8217;s New York Times features Once Stigmatized, Food Stamps Find Acceptance, a story about the increasing demand for food stamps. In an earlier article, the NYT published one of its peerless national maps illustrating food stamp usage across the country. (&#8220;The number of food stamp recipients has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin: 4px 0 0 15px;">
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/11/us/11foodstamps.html"><img src="http://www.webdogs.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/nyt_food_stamps1-300x236.png" alt="" /></a>
</div>
<p>Part of its ongoing &#8220;Safety Net&#8221; series, this morning&#8217;s New York Times features <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/11/us/11foodstamps.html">Once Stigmatized, Food Stamps Find Acceptance</a>, a story about the increasing demand for food stamps. In an earlier article, the NYT published one of its peerless national maps illustrating <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/11/28/us/20091128-foodstamps.html">food stamp usage across the country</a>. (&#8220;The number of food stamp recipients has climbed by about 10 million over the past two years, resulting in a program that now feeds 1 in 8 Americans and nearly 1 in 4 children.&#8221;)</p>
<p>This historic escalation is reflected in the web stats for the <a href="http://www.foodstampguide.org/">California Food Stamp Guide</a>. A year ago, we drew attention to how the usage patterns at the FSG were <a href="http://www.webdogs.org/2009/03/01/web-traffic-as-a-sign-of-economic-times/">a sign of the economic times</a>. If so, then it has only gotten worse. Since then, as illustrated below, current Google Analytics for the FSG show monthly visitor sessions have increased to nearly 10,700 (a 52% increase), with over 101,000 page views (a 27% increase) and a bounce rate of only 0.25%. Annualized, this increase in the monthly usage rates of the FSG comes to more than 128,000 visitor sessions and 1,216,000 page views.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.webdogs.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/food_stamp_web_stats.png" alt="" title="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webdogs.org/2010/02/11/revisiting-web-stats-for-the-california-food-stamp-guide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;A List Apart&quot; search / usability trifecta</title>
		<link>http://www.webdogs.org/2009/09/22/a-list-apart-search-usability-trifecta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webdogs.org/2009/09/22/a-list-apart-search-usability-trifecta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lawlor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[findability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google analytics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdogs.org/findability/?p=956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search is nothing new but it is, paradoxically, the new new within some circles of web design and definitely a core element of any sensible usability construct for web sites and web applications. On that note, A List Apart, the New York Times of web design, today publishes a search cum usability trifecta hitting on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search is nothing new but it is, paradoxically, the new new within some circles of web design and definitely a core element of any sensible usability construct for web sites and web applications. On that note, <a href="http://www.alistapart.com/">A List Apart</a>, the New York Times of web design, today publishes a search cum usability trifecta hitting on several issues I will be alluding to during the upcoming TIG conference, including what to make of your metrics. All the articles are read-worthy:</p>
<ul class="content">
<li><a href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/testing-search-for-relevancy-and-precision/">Testing Search for Relevancy and Precision</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/internal-site-search-analysis-simple-effective-life-altering/">Internal Site Search Analysis: Simple, Effective, Life Altering!</a> (by Avinash Kaushik of <a href="http://www.kaushik.net/">Occam&#8217;s Razor</a> fame)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/beyond-goals-site-search-analytics-from-the-bottom-up/">Beyond Goals: Site Search Analytics from the Bottom Up</a> (by Lou Rosenfeld, co-author with Peter Morville of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Information-Architecture-World-Wide-Web/dp/1565922824">Information Architecture for the World Wide Web</a>)</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webdogs.org/2009/09/22/a-list-apart-search-usability-trifecta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web traffic as a sign of economic times</title>
		<link>http://www.webdogs.org/2009/03/01/web-traffic-as-a-sign-of-economic-times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webdogs.org/2009/03/01/web-traffic-as-a-sign-of-economic-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 09:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lawlor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food stamps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdogs.org/?p=447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a web metric that tells us, on the one hand, we are doing something right but, on the other, reflects how grim things are out there.
It&#8217;s like this: Two months ago, in a different context, we observed that traffic at the California Food Stamp Guide seemed to have reached an annualized plateau of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a web metric that tells us, on the one hand, we are doing something right but, on the other, reflects how grim things are out there.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like this: Two months ago, in a <a href="http://www.webdogs.org/?p=419">different context</a>, we observed that traffic at the <a href="http://www.foodstampguide.org/">California Food Stamp Guide</a> seemed to have reached an annualized plateau of about 54,000 visitor sessions and 570,000 page views. Pretty much what we were expecting based on our experience with traffic at the earlier version it replaced.</p>
<p>That was then. This is now: Traffic at that site has escalated dramatically in the last two months, to 7.000+ visitor sessions with 79,000 page views, per month, which annualizes to 84,000+ visitor sessions and now approaching a million page views, at 948,000+ page views per year:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.webdogs.org/dog_files/fsg_stats.png" alt="" /></p>
<p><img style="float: right; margin: 0 10px 0 20px;" src="http://www.webdogs.org/dog_files/fsg_sources.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>Translation: In the last two months, there has been a 55% jump in visitor sessions and 66% jump in page views. And the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounce_Rate">bounce rate</a> now falls regularly below 1%, hovering around 0.65% most days. More people are finding it and sticking to the site.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s going on? During this more recent 30-day period, illustrated above, 86% of the visitor sessions were driven by 3,841 different keyword searches (the proverbial <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Long_Tail">long tail</a>). People have always been looking for help getting food stamps. But a whole lot more are now out there looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webdogs.org/2009/03/01/web-traffic-as-a-sign-of-economic-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google love comes to FeedBurner</title>
		<link>http://www.webdogs.org/2007/06/01/google-love-comes-to-feedburner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webdogs.org/2007/06/01/google-love-comes-to-feedburner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 19:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lawlor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feedburner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdogs.org/2007/06/01/google-love-comes-to-feedburner/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is now official: Google has acquired FeedBurner. Whew, are we happy now that we have wallowed so purposefully all these many months into using FeedBurner for tracking all the LSNC feed content, while also working our way deeper into Google Analytics. Major FeedBurner synergy here, people.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is now official: Google has acquired FeedBurner. Whew, are we happy now that we have wallowed so purposefully all these many months into using <a href="http://www.feedburner.com/">FeedBurner</a> for tracking all the LSNC feed content, while also working our way deeper into <a href="http://www.google.com/analytics/">Google Analytics</a>. Major <a href="http://blogs.feedburner.com/feedburner/archives/2007/06/feedburner_google.php">FeedBurner synergy</a> here, people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webdogs.org/2007/06/01/google-love-comes-to-feedburner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
